PolarixGrowth Partners Search/
Discuss a project
Home/What the people who pay for traffic say
Reviews

What the people who pay for traffic say

24 reviews, average score 4.75 out of 5. Each one carries a job title, a geo and a result metric.

4.75out of 5 · 24 reviews
  1. 5 ★18
  2. 4 ★6
  3. 3 ★0
  4. 2 ★0
  5. 1 ★0

A 4 is a measured reservation: a deadline slipped, a figure came in under forecast. We do not hide those reviews.

Vertical
Region
Metric
★★★★★LATAM
In the first ten days they tested seven sources and kept four. Cost per first deposit in Brazil fell from $84 to $48, with no loss in volume.
FTD in Brazil at $48 vs. $65 target
A. KovalenkoHead of Acquisition, sportsbook
★★★★★Tier 3
We launched in-app and Telegram simultaneously in the Philippines. By week three in-app delivered 70% of deposits on half the budget share — without step-by-step funnel data we would have missed that.
$23 per FTD in the Philippines
S. OliveiraCMO, casino brand
★★★★★CIS
Auditing our active Telegram channels took two weeks instead of the promised five days — but in the end 60% of placements with inflated views were cut. Unpleasant to learn the scale of the problem, yet CPA normalised immediately.
CPA across CIS down 38% after the cleanup
D. PetrovAffiliate Manager, affiliate network
★★★★★Tier 1
Google certification in Germany took twenty-two days. The campaign was planned from the certificate date, not our deadline, and in six weeks we got 410 FTDs at USD 174 — within the forecast.
410 FTDs in Germany in six weeks
L. AndersenGrowth Lead, sportsbook
★★★★★APAC
For a casino brand in Japan we placed integrations with four YouTube creators. Search traffic from those videos kept converting ten weeks out — FTD at $127, and half arrived after the flight ended.
$127 per FTD in Japan, half delayed
K. YamamotoMedia Buying Lead, casino brand
★★★★★MENA
Reactivation of the UAE database worked — 14% returned to deposits within three weeks. But the email campaign launch was delayed ten days because of domain warm-up, and we lost part of the window around the tournament.
14% of reactivated users returned to deposit
N. HassanHead of Retention, sportsbook
★★★★★Europe
They ran programmatic buying for us across Poland and Czechia. Out of 2,800 domains, 340 made the whitelist — but those 340 delivered FTDs at $93 instead of the $150+ market rate.
FTD at $93 vs. $150+ market rate
R. KowalskiPartnership Manager, affiliate network
★★★★★LATAM
We launched a casino brand in Colombia from scratch: paid social and in-app on a $28,000 budget. Creatives were refreshed every two weeks because TikTok burned out in ten days. Result: 640 FTDs at $44.
640 FTDs in Colombia in six weeks
M. TorresCPO, casino brand
★★★★★Tier 1
Bing Ads turned out to be the second-largest source in the Netherlands — clicks 40% cheaper than Google, with nearly the same deposit conversion. In eight weeks we got 280 FTDs at USD 181.
280 FTDs in the Netherlands, Bing 40% cheaper than Google
J. van DijkHead of Acquisition, sportsbook
★★★★★Tier 3
In Nigeria push traffic gave cheap installs, but day-7 returns were below 5%. We had to restructure the mix toward in-app — the price went up, but repeat deposits finally appeared. An expensive lesson, but a useful one.
Repeat deposits tripled after the mix change
E. MensahGrowth Lead, sportsbook
★★★★★Tier 2
In Greece we picked 18 Telegram channels out of 90 — the criterion was simple: actual reach of recent posts, not follower count. Cost per deposit came to $74, which is very strong for Tier 2.
$74 per FTD in Greece via Telegram
P. StavrosCMO, casino brand
★★★★★Europe
Search campaign in Denmark — 240 FTDs at USD 192 over six weeks. Bing accounted for only 15% of volume, but its registration-to-deposit rate was 21% versus 14% for Google. Without a per-source breakdown that would be invisible.
240 FTDs in Denmark, Bing best conversion
A. LindqvistMedia Buying Lead, sportsbook
★★★★★APAC
Buying YouTube creators in South Korea was expensive — $143 per first trade — but the average trading volume from acquired accounts covered the cost within six weeks. Without an LTV forecast we would have killed the campaign in week three.
Payback in 6 weeks at $143 per first trade
T. NakamuraHead of Acquisition, crypto exchange
★★★★★CIS
Promoting the exchanger in CIS Telegram chats brought a stream of requests, but the completed-swap rate stayed below 40% for the first two weeks. The issue was withdrawal limits, not traffic. Once the limits were raised, conversion reached 67%.
Completed-swap rate 67% after limit adjustment
V. SokolovaGrowth Lead, exchanger
★★★★★MENA
In the UAE an influencer campaign delivered 290 first trades in five weeks at $152 each. Expensive per contact, but the audience actually traded: average turnover in month one exceeded $4,000.
290 first trades in the UAE in five weeks
B. Al-FarsiCMO, crypto exchange
★★★★★Europe
We placed reviews on five comparison sites across Europe. The channel is slow — first conversions appeared after a month — but by month four the cost per verified trader was $89, and the flow did not depend on daily spend.
$89 per verified trader by month four
C. DuboisPartnership Manager, trading platform
★★★★★LATAM
In Argentina we collected 9,200 exchange sign-ups in four weeks. 58% passed KYC — we expected 50%. The key was checking verification rates before the media plan: two sources were cut in advance because their traffic in that GEO did not clear documents.
9,200 sign-ups, 58% KYC in Argentina
F. SantosMedia Buying Lead, crypto exchange
★★★★★APAC
We hit 120,000 mini-app entries in two weeks — an impressive number, but day-7 retention was 19%. We had expected at least 25%. The team warned us beforehand that retention would be the challenge, and they were right — the next flight was planned from D7, not from entries.
120,000 entries, D7 retention 19%
H. KimCPO, Web3 game
★★★★★Tier 1
They audited crypto channels for our advertisers — out of 200 Telegram placements, 54 passed vetting. On the survivors the cost per first trade in the UK came to $187, which is very competitive for Tier-1 crypto.
$187 per first trade in the UK
O. JohanssonAffiliate Manager, affiliate network
★★★★★LATAM
Email reactivation across a base of 48,000 inactive users in Mexico and Argentina. 11% returned to trading — and since they had already passed KYC, we paid nothing for verification a second time.
11% of reactivated users returned to trading
I. MoralesHead of Retention, crypto exchange
★★★★★Tier 3
Wallet promotion in Nigeria and Kenya via in-app and Telegram channels. The install cost next to nothing, but the real metric was day-2 return rate — 34%. That is what we optimised for, not download numbers.
D2 retention at 34% for wallet promotion
W. OkaforGrowth Lead, wallet
★★★★★Europe
A campaign on X and with crypto creators in Germany and Austria. Reach built up fast, but verification conversion was a third below the forecast — platforms required more documents than we had planned for. The outcome was still positive, but the first month was tense.
Verified trader cost USD 214
R. BergmannCMO, trading platform
★★★★★CIS
We reached the top line on two rate monitors within three months — organic swap requests grew fourfold. The channel keeps running without daily spend, and that is its core advantage over paid buying.
Organic flow 4x in three months
G. AslanovHead of Acquisition, exchanger
★★★★★APAC
Three KOL integrations on YouTube for the Thailand market launch. First trades started in week two, but the bulk accumulated by week six — YouTube algorithms picked up the videos later than expected. Total: 310 first trades at $94.
310 first trades in Thailand at $94
Z. TanakaMedia Buying Lead, crypto exchange
Media plan in 48 hours

Calculated for your GEO and budget

Describe the product, GEO and budget — we come back with a media plan in 48 hours. Free and without obligation.

Get the media plan
Media plan in 48 hours